Model comparison
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports a wider range of input modalities, while Claude Opus 4.7 emphasizes text-focused operations with ethical reasoning.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic's heavyweight for hard reasoning and agentic work.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google's latest frontier model with expanded reasoning.
Specs
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1.0M tokens↑ |
| Input $/1M tokens | $5.00 | $2.00↑ |
| Output $/1M tokens | $25.00 | $12.00↑ |
| Modalities | Text · Image | Audio · File · Image · Text · Video |
| Open weights | No | No |
How they differ
Input modalities
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 supports text and image inputs.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports text, image, audio, file, and video inputs.
Context handling
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 allows up to 1,000,000 tokens of context, favoring extensive text-based discussions.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports up to 1,048,576 tokens of context, slightly more than Claude, accommodating broader input scope.
Cost profile
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 charges $5.0/1M input tokens and $25.0/1M output tokens, resulting in higher operational costs.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro operates at $2.0/1M input tokens and $12.0/1M output tokens, offering lower overall expenses.
Claude Opus 4.7 — what sets it apart
- +Focuses on text and image inputs exclusively.
- +Designed with a strong emphasis on ethical reasoning and human alignment.
Gemini 3.1 Pro — what sets it apart
- +Supports multimodal inputs, including audio, file, and video.
- +Offers a more cost-efficient pricing structure that aids in scaling.
The most consequential difference lies in the broader modality support and cost efficiency of Gemini 3.1 Pro compared to the text-centric design and ethical emphasis of Claude Opus 4.7.
Analysis synthesized from gpt-4o, llama-4-maverick, phi-4, etc.