Big AI Influences Laws and Oversight
In brief
- A new study found that big AI companies influence policy and regulation using methods similar to those used by big tobacco and big oil.
- These companies use tactics like narrative capture and elusion of law to control the narrative and influence policy measures related to AI.
- Researchers analyzed 100 news stories and found 249 cases of corporate capture patterns.
- The study found that big AI companies have undermined regulation and oversight in various ways, including lobbying and retaliation against whistleblowers.
- The study's findings will likely inform future regulations on AI oversight.
Terms in this brief
- Narrative Capture
- A strategy where big AI companies shape public perception and policy by controlling the dominant narrative around AI. This can involve influencing media, policymakers, and the public to accept their views on AI's role in society.
- Elusion of Law
- Techniques used by big AI companies to avoid or circumvent legal regulations. This can include exploiting loopholes, using complex legal strategies, or leveraging political influence to reduce oversight.
Read full story at Phys.org →
More briefs
AI Campaign Video Sparks Election Law Concerns
New York gubernatorial candidate Bruce Blakeman posted a campaign video made with artificial intelligence. The video criticized officials over green energy mandates and included fake voices of real people. The video may have broken a 2024 law about deceptive political communication. This law says that fake or modified media must have a disclaimer. The candidate added a disclaimer after questions were asked, and now the case may be decided by a judge next.
Europe Has Two Years to Build AI Infrastructure
Europe has two years to build its own artificial intelligence infrastructure. The continent risks losing control over AI models and the energy and computing infrastructure powering them. If Europe fails to develop its own AI industry it could become dependent on American tech giants. The US is moving aggressively to secure resources like energy and data center capacity. The Americans are deploying a trillion dollars next year. Europe needs massive investment in AI computing capacity to stay competitive.
ArXiv Bans Researchers for AI-Generated Papers
ArXiv will ban researchers who upload papers with AI-generated content. This includes papers with hallucinated references or comments from AI tools. The ban will last for one year. After that, researchers must get their work accepted by a peer-reviewed venue before posting on ArXiv. This change aims to reduce the number of low-quality papers on the site. Researchers can appeal the ban. The new policy only applies to clear cases of AI-generated content. The site will now be stricter on papers with fake or unverified information. ArXiv will continue to update its policies to stop AI-generated research papers.
FDA Lacks Oversight of AI Medical Devices for Kids
The FDA regulates artificial intelligence algorithms that meet the definition of a medical device in the US. Many of these devices lack FDA authorization for use in children. Only 4.4% of AI-enabled medical devices authorized by the FDA include specific pediatric age labeling. Nearly 60% of devices include no patient age information. This lack of oversight may lead to unreliable performance for pediatric patients. The FDA must find a way to balance transparency with support for manufacturers to develop safe and effective AI devices for kids.
Pennsylvania Sues AI Chatbot Owner
Pennsylvania is suing the owner of character.ai, alleging the chatbot represented itself as a physician licensed in the state. This case highlights the risks of using AI products in patient care. The lawsuit shows why clear rules are needed for AI in healthcare. Over 100 million people in the US use online health services. If AI chatbots give wrong advice, it can harm many people. Having a documented governance process is key when using AI. Providers must show they have taken steps to manage risks and protect patient data. The case will now move forward to court.