California Governor Proposes National AI Equity Fund

Former FTC Advisors Call for AI Education Campaign

Former FTC advisors are calling for a public education campaign about AI. They say enforcement alone is not enough to protect the public from digital harms. The advisors worked to limit corporate data collection and change business models. Now they want a Truth Campaign for the AI era. Half of Americans are concerned about AI and most doubt their ability to tell if words or images came from a machine. The campaign would address the rise in scams and threats to public trust. It would also help people critical thinking skills. The future of AI education will depend on such campaigns.

Bernie Sanders Proposes AI Stock Transfer

Bernie Sanders proposed that AI providers give 50 percent of their stock to the government. This would be done through a one-time tax paid in stock, not cash. The plan would give the government control over AI companies. This matters because AI models use content created by people, not the companies. The government would get dividends from the stock, which could be used for public services. The tax would transfer over $1 trillion of stock equity to the government. The proposal is similar to state-owned enterprises found in other countries. The government would have a say in AI company decisions. The plan will likely be discussed further in the coming months.

ChatGPT Use Raises Privacy Concerns in Legal Cases

People are using AI tools like ChatGPT for quick legal guidance. Conversations with chatbots are not protected like private conversations with an attorney. This means that what people search for and when can be used as evidence in court. Attorneys can ask about AI use during depositions and seek records. This information can include what a person searched for and when, and anything that might show what someone was thinking or planning. Over 1000 people use ChatGPT every week for legal guidance. As more people use AI tools for legal help, the risk of private information being used in court will grow. The use of AI in legal cases will likely continue to increase in the future.

Data Center Backlash Grows

Texas Governor Greg Abbott has unveiled recommendations to regulate data center development. At the same time New York Governor Kathy Hochul is considering a bill to impose a one-year moratorium on large-scale data centers. Some 70 percent of Americans oppose local construction of AI data centers. This opposition is driven by concerns about rising electricity bills, water scarcity, and noise. At least 75 data center projects worth roughly $130 billion were stalled or blocked in the first three months of 2026. The backlash against data centers is expected to continue as more people link the technology boom to job losses and dwindling local resources.

EU AI Act Fails to Offer Direct Remedies, Relies on GDPR for Redress

The European Union's AI Act, which aims to protect fundamental rights, falls short in providing direct ways to address harm caused by AI systems. Instead of outlining specific solutions, the law depends on existing EU regulations like the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) to handle AI-related damages. This means individuals affected by AI could still seek redress through privacy laws rather than under the AI Act itself. The lack of explicit remedies in the AI Act leaves a significant gap in addressing potential harms from AI technologies. While the GDPR provides some protections, such as the right to explanation and data access, these may not fully cover all AI-related issues. Critics argue that this approach shifts the burden onto an already complex legal framework, potentially limiting the effectiveness of AI regulation. Looking ahead, experts suggest that clearer guidelines and additional safeguards within the AI Act could better protect users from AI-driven risks. Future updates to EU regulations might focus on expanding redress options and ensuring stronger accountability measures for AI systems.