latentbrief

Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.4

The most significant observable difference is Gemini 3.1 Pro's support for audio and video inputs, which GPT-5.4 lacks.

Specs

MetricGemini 3.1 ProGPT-5.4
Context window1.0M tokens1.1M tokens
Input $/1M tokens$2.00$2.50
Output $/1M tokens$12.00$15.00
ModalitiesAudio · File · Image · Text · VideoText · Image · File
Open weightsNoNo

How they differ

Reasoning approach

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro is designed for multimodal reasoning across text, audio, image, and video inputs.

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 is optimized for text-based reasoning, with additional support for image and file inputs.

Context handling

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro supports up to 1,048,576 tokens with integrated multimodal capabilities.

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 supports up to 1,050,000 tokens, with its focus on text and image data.

Cost profile

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.0 per 1M input tokens and $12.0 per 1M output tokens.

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 costs $2.5 per 1M input tokens and $15.0 per 1M output tokens.

Vision

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro supports multimodal visual inputs, including images and videos.

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 supports image inputs but does not include video processing.

Gemini 3.1 Pro — what sets it apart

  • +Supports audio and video inputs, enabling richer multimodal interaction.
  • +Offers slightly lower input and output costs, making it more cost-efficient for certain use cases.

GPT-5.4 — what sets it apart

  • +Has a marginally larger context window capacity at 1,050,000 tokens.
  • +Specializes in high-quality text and image tasks, excluding audio and video integration.

The most consequential difference is Gemini 3.1 Pro's capability to handle audio and video inputs, while GPT-5.4 focuses primarily on text and image tasks with a slightly larger token limit.

Analysis synthesized from gpt-4o, llama-4-maverick, phi-4, etc.