latentbrief

Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

The most significant observable difference between Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Grok 3 is Claude's support for multimodal input, including text and images, while Grok is limited to text-only input.

Specs

MetricGrok 3Claude Sonnet 4.6
Context window131K tokens1M tokens
Input $/1M tokens$3.00$3.00
Output $/1M tokens$15.00$15.00
ModalitiesTextText · Image
Open weightsNoNo

Capability differences

CapabilityGrok 3Claude Sonnet 4.6
Prompt cachingNoYes

How they differ

Context handling

Grok 3

Grok 3 supports a 131,072 token context window, which is smaller but sufficient for many text-based tasks.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports a vastly larger context window of 1,000,000 tokens, enabling extended input handling.

Vision

Grok 3

Grok 3 is limited to text input, excluding visual data processing.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6 processes both text and image inputs, supporting multimodal applications.

Cost profile

Grok 3

Grok 3 shares the same cost structure of $3.0/1M input tokens and $15.0/1M output tokens for text-only processing.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6 charges $3.0/1M input tokens and $15.0/1M output tokens, applicable to both text and image processing.

Grok 3 — what sets it apart

  • +Optimized for text-only processing, focusing on precise and engaging text outputs.
  • +Implements a substantial context window of 131,072 tokens for efficient text handling.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 — what sets it apart

  • +Supports multimodal inputs, including both text and images.
  • +Provides an extensive context capacity of up to 1,000,000 tokens.

The most consequential difference is Claude Sonnet 4.6's support for multimodal inputs, including images, while Grok 3 is text-only.

Analysis synthesized from gpt-4o, llama-4-maverick, phi-4, etc.