Berkeley Law Bans AI Use in Exams and Credited Coursework
In brief
- UC Berkeley School of Law has introduced an Artificial Intelligence Policy that prohibits students from using AI to conceptualize, outline, draft, revise, translate, or edit work submitted for credit.
- The policy also bans AI use for any purpose in any exam situation.
- The policy matters because it affects how students learn and develop skills needed for lawyering.
- For example, students can use AI only for limited source identification in papers.
- This means students must do most of the work themselves, such as drafting and editing.
- The school will enforce this policy starting Summer 2026, and students will have to adapt to new rules and guidelines for using AI in their studies, and soon they will have to navigate these new rules in their upcoming semester.
Read full story at EdTech Innovation Hub →
More briefs
Vatican Issues Landmark AI Ethical Guidelines
The Vatican has released a significant new document addressing the ethical integration of artificial intelligence into society. Titled Magnifica Humanitas, this encyclical from Pope Leo XIV builds on the legacy of his namesake, Pope Leo XIII, who famously addressed social issues during the first industrial revolution. The new text focuses on protecting human dignity, justice, and labor in the face of AI advancements. The encyclical highlights key challenges posed by AI, such as the lack of interpretability in large language models (LLMs). It emphasizes that current systems are more "cultivated" than "built," meaning developers don't fully understand how these AI systems function. This lack of clarity raises important questions about accountability and control over AI-driven decisions. Looking ahead, the Vatican's guidelines aim to spark global dialogue on ethical AI development and deployment. As AI continues to evolve, this document provides a thoughtful framework for balancing innovation with the protection of human values.
Pope Issues Historic AI Encyclical
Pope Leo XIV has released a groundbreaking encyclical titled Magnifica Humanitas ("Magnificent Humanity"), addressing the ethical and moral implications of artificial intelligence for people worldwide. The document, while lengthy and dense, offers a comprehensive exploration of AI's potential benefits and risks, urging humanity to engage in thoughtful discernment. The encyclical emphasizes that AI is not inherently good or bad but reflects the values and intentions of those who develop and use it. It calls for ethical considerations in AI deployment, particularly in avoiding exploitation and dehumanization. While Pope Leo acknowledges AI's potential benefits, he stresses the importance of collective effort to ensure a flourishing future. This encyclical sets a foundation for future discussions on AI ethics but is not the final word. As technology evolves, further dialogue and moral guidance will be essential.
FTC Fines Companies for Deceptive AI Advertising
The Federal Trade Commission fined three companies for deceiving small business customers about an AI-powered advertising service. The companies claimed the service could capture and analyze consumers' real-world conversations through smart device microphones and serve hyper-targeted ads. The companies collected no voice data at all, instead reselling email lists purchased from data brokers at a significant markup. The FTC fined Cox Media Group $880,000 and two digital marketing firms $25,000 each. The companies are subject to 20-year monitorships and the fines show that AI marketing deception is an enforcement priority, with the FTC focusing on this space since 2024, and companies will be held accountable for deceptive practices in the future.
US Companies Fined for Deceptive Marketing Claims
US companies CMG Media Corporation, MindSift, and 1010 Digital Works have agreed to pay $930,000 to settle claims they made deceptive marketing claims. The companies claimed their service could use artificial intelligence to listen to conversations via smartphones and smart speakers to identify consumer interests. The settlement highlights the importance of truthful marketing and the need to protect consumer privacy, with the companies now required to pay a significant fine, and the case will likely influence future marketing practices.
NC Lawmakers Move to Regulate AI in Health Insurance
North Carolina lawmakers are proposing a new law to limit the use of artificial intelligence in health insurance decisions. This law would stop insurers from using AI to deny claims or prior authorization requests without human involvement. The proposed law aims to prevent AI from causing higher healthcare costs through a practice called upcoding. Upcoding happens when hospitals and healthcare providers use higher billing codes to get more money from insurers. This can lead to higher premiums for patients. The law would require human review of billing codes to prevent AI from pushing towards more expensive codes. The new law could help reduce healthcare costs in North Carolina, which has some of the highest costs in the nation. Lawmakers will now review the proposal and decide whether to pass it into law.