US Companies Fined for Deceptive Marketing Claims
In brief
- US companies CMG Media Corporation, MindSift, and 1010 Digital Works have agreed to pay $930,000 to settle claims they made deceptive marketing claims.
- The companies claimed their service could use artificial intelligence to listen to conversations via smartphones and smart speakers to identify consumer interests.
- The settlement highlights the importance of truthful marketing and the need to protect consumer privacy, with the companies now required to pay a significant fine, and the case will likely influence future marketing practices.
Read full story at IAPP →
More briefs
NC Lawmakers Move to Regulate AI in Health Insurance
North Carolina lawmakers are proposing a new law to limit the use of artificial intelligence in health insurance decisions. This law would stop insurers from using AI to deny claims or prior authorization requests without human involvement. The proposed law aims to prevent AI from causing higher healthcare costs through a practice called upcoding. Upcoding happens when hospitals and healthcare providers use higher billing codes to get more money from insurers. This can lead to higher premiums for patients. The law would require human review of billing codes to prevent AI from pushing towards more expensive codes. The new law could help reduce healthcare costs in North Carolina, which has some of the highest costs in the nation. Lawmakers will now review the proposal and decide whether to pass it into law.
AI Campaign Video Sparks Election Law Concerns
New York gubernatorial candidate Bruce Blakeman posted a campaign video made with artificial intelligence. The video criticized officials over green energy mandates and included fake voices of real people. The video may have broken a 2024 law about deceptive political communication. This law says that fake or modified media must have a disclaimer. The candidate added a disclaimer after questions were asked, and now the case may be decided by a judge next.
Big AI Influences Laws and Oversight
A new study found that big AI companies influence policy and regulation using methods similar to those used by big tobacco and big oil. These companies use tactics like narrative capture and elusion of law to control the narrative and influence policy measures related to AI. Researchers analyzed 100 news stories and found 249 cases of corporate capture patterns. The study found that big AI companies have undermined regulation and oversight in various ways, including lobbying and retaliation against whistleblowers. The study's findings will likely inform future regulations on AI oversight.
Europe Has Two Years to Build AI Infrastructure
Europe has two years to build its own artificial intelligence infrastructure. The continent risks losing control over AI models and the energy and computing infrastructure powering them. If Europe fails to develop its own AI industry it could become dependent on American tech giants. The US is moving aggressively to secure resources like energy and data center capacity. The Americans are deploying a trillion dollars next year. Europe needs massive investment in AI computing capacity to stay competitive.
ArXiv Bans Researchers for AI-Generated Papers
ArXiv will ban researchers who upload papers with AI-generated content. This includes papers with hallucinated references or comments from AI tools. The ban will last for one year. After that, researchers must get their work accepted by a peer-reviewed venue before posting on ArXiv. This change aims to reduce the number of low-quality papers on the site. Researchers can appeal the ban. The new policy only applies to clear cases of AI-generated content. The site will now be stricter on papers with fake or unverified information. ArXiv will continue to update its policies to stop AI-generated research papers.